Abnormal state in one disk after power outage. I Can not access it

您所在的位置:网站首页 abnormal state游戏攻略 Abnormal state in one disk after power outage. I Can not access it

Abnormal state in one disk after power outage. I Can not access it

2024-07-15 14:02| 来源: 网络整理| 查看: 265

jcmpes wrote: ↑Thu Dec 06, 2018 6:21 pm Hi Thisisnotmyname,

Really appreciate your words and thank you for taking the time to share with me the pro-tips and an outstanding explanation.

I have one question: One of my other disks has very sensible data so I am currently buying another 6TB WD RED disk for my nas to replace the failed one and I plan to use the new one in a RAID array to replicate the important disk. Would you recommend another model of HDD? What type of Raid would you recommment to use in this scenario?

Many thanks

So there's a whole lot that can go into that answer that would be highly dependent on your personal situation. Any RAID (other than 0) will provide more redundancy than you have today. So you could do as little as a RAID 1 with the drive that has your sensitive data and the new drive you are adding. That will mirror the data between the drives and losing either one of them will retain the data on the other. That does nothing to protect the data on the rest of your drives though. If it were me I'd combine them all into a RAID array. You have too much data for a RAID 10 setup with 6TB disks so your choices would be RAID 5 or RAID 6. RAID 5 will provide more capacity as you only lose one drive worth of space to the parity data but if you ever lose more than one disk at once (which can definitely happen) you lose the entire array. RAID 6 requires two disks worth of space for parity data (so effectively you are left with three disks worth of capacity in your five bay NAS, a little under 16TB) but you can lose two disks and still recover the array.

There are performance impacts to RAID as well. Read speeds generally are better with RAID than they would have been on individual disks. You get to read from all the disks rather than just one so you basically take the read speed of one disk and multiply it up by the number of disks (e.g. if you were getting 175MB/s read speed out of an individual disk you could get about 350MB/s out of a two drive RAID1 or 875MB/s out of a five drive RAID5 or 6). That will very quickly get limited by other factors though (i.e. that NAS has 10GbE ports but if you are then running through a 1GbE switch you'll saturate the network at about 125MB/s anyway). Write speeds take a hit under parity RAIDs (5 or 6 in this discussion). If this is a business environment and you have a lot of people writing to all the volumes concurrently then they probably have better write performance under your current setup than with RAID 5 or 6. RAID 5 makes 4 I/O operations per write and RAID 6 makes 6 so you take your total write capacity and divide by 4 or 6 respectively. If you are mostly doing reads, or if writes are spread out and you don't have many people writing at the same time, or if write aren't performance sensitive like backups happening in the background, then that won't affect you.

Personally I'd go RAID 6 if it would provide enough capacity for the data you store. Other people on this forum would disagree strongly with me and go RAID 5. Your call as to balancing redundancy vs performance vs capacity (the latter of which ultimately comes down to price).

Just another reminder, regardless of RAID level you'll still want to backup your data somewhere other than the NAS for all the reasons I called out before. Look into a cloud storage solution and setup hybrid backup sync to automatically push your data up to the cloud (at least the very sensitive data). That way in the event you lose your whole array (or entire NAS in the case of fire or theft or such) you can still recover.



【本文地址】


今日新闻


推荐新闻


CopyRight 2018-2019 办公设备维修网 版权所有 豫ICP备15022753号-3